Category Archives: CFMoto 450MT project bike

Preview: 2026 Morini 450 Alltrhike (Vettore)

When I ‘started out on my motorcycle journey’ in the 1970s, Morini’s red and black, mag-wheeled, v-twin (right) was one of the coolest bikes no one rode. A mini Ducati 900SS for the price of a 750 Bonneville which many more of us actually bought. I haven’t seen a Morini since those days, but like so many classics, the ‘Fre’n’arf’ is supposed to be back one of these days, looks even better and probably runs a lot better too.

Chinese owned and manufactured since 2018, but designed and developed in Milan, out already and soon in the UK is Morini’s entry into the optimal 450cc travel bike segment, the Alltrhike 450. What a crippling neologism that looks like a typo or is more suited to a pair of trail shoes. In the US they’re calling it Vettore. Better. Why not just call it X-Cape 450, or even X-Cape 4½ to go with the X-Cape 700 and 1200 twins? In the UK the ‘All-Trike’ will cost just just £5300 for the up-spec, all-heated version.

Underneath, it’s a CF Moto 450MT
Look closely and you’ll see it’s actually based on the CF Moto 450 MT (left) which I ran from new a couple of years ago and liked very much. The wheels are the same spoked tubeless (overlooked in official specs). The 6-speed, 270° CF Moto motor is the same – another big plus, especially if they’ve ironed out the CF’s slightly annoying low-speed fuelling glitch. I’d also guess the frame, pipe, JJ brakes and KYB suspension are the same too. With such proven tech and engineering, that’s all a good thing which will help the Morini hit the ground in third.
I got a little excited when I saw the weight of 170kg listed and then parroted around. Digging deeper reveals a more realistic 190kg dry. By the time you brim the 18.5-litre tank, that’ll be 204kg wet, 7kg more than my old CB500X, and not far off an XT700. I wish CF or Morini or anyone had been bold to design a pannier tank, like the KTM 790/890. Nearly 20 litres is a lot of weight up high.

Morini Alltrhike / Vettore 450 vs CF Moto 450MT Ibex

Slimmer tank area, despite being larger volume
Snatchy low-speed fuelling sorted?
Rear seat drops down to make a smoothish bench seat
Centre stand
Longer service intervals
Lots of heating
Phone-mirrored Carbit Ride nav on display
Cheaper than CF Moto in UK
Same proven engine and TL wheels
Three-way adjustable handlebar and even foot pegs

Alltrhike is not a catchy name
Heavier than the already top-heavy CF
Screen pivots forward and back, not up and down
Not bad looking but CF Moto looks better

Based on nothing more than online data, below is a comparison table for the Morini Alltrhike / Vettore, CF Moto 450 and the nearly here BMW F450GS. The BMW may end up a lot more than even the base £7000, but if the wet weight of 178kg including 14 litres is to be believed, that’s a ~full jerrican less than the Chinese 450s. And you can be sure in a year there’ll be a F450GS Adventure with a 21-inch front, bigger tank and more suspension travel.

Morini • CF Moto • BMW • Honda
Morini Alltrhike 450CF Moto 450 (Ibex)BMW F450GS 420ccHonda NX500
471cc, E-Clutch 2026
Price new UK£5300£5700£7000£7000
Dry/wet weight190/204kg183/195kg *verified167/178kg187/199kg
Seat height33″/840mm adj32.5″/825mm *adj33″/840mm adj32.7″/830mm adj
Tank volume18.5L17.5L *14L17.5L
Engine / powerP-twin 270° 44hpSameP-twin 135° 48hpP-twin 180° 47hp
Service intervals6000km4500km10,000km12,800km
Pairable navYesNoYes?Yes
Adj seat and screenYesYesOption?No
ConnectivityUSBUSB and USB-CUSB-COption
Centre standYesOptionOption?Option
Wheels18/21 spoked tubelessSame17/19 cast tubeless17/19 cast tubeless
SuspensionUSD KYB 41mm/ 208mm, fully adj
Rear KYB 190mm, preload and rebound
SameFully adj, USD 43mm and rear. 180mm F&RUSD 41mm, shock preload only. 133/119mm F&R
BrakesDisc F&R (rear ABS switchable)SameBrembo / ByBre Disc F&R with ABSDual front discs ABS


Tested: Kenda Big Block review

The chunky Kenda Big Block has been on my ‘tyres to try’ list for years, so when I set off for Morocco on my near-new 450MT last October, I arranged for a 140/80-18 (7.1kg) and 90/90-21 (5.2kg) to be dropped off in Marrakech, assuming the bike’s stock CSTs would not last long or soon degrade. I know John M from Rally Raid is a fan of the Kendas (below).
The rear is listed as 140/70-18, but I’m told this size is rare, so the 140/80 rear Kenda would be a bit wider, taller and probably heavier.

In the meantime, road and trail, I was quite impressed with the stock Cheng Shin (CST) Ambro 4s which bear a striking resemblance to the Pirelli Scorpion Rally STR.

With probably a 1000 miles left in the Ambros (above left) at around 4600 miles, I decided to get the Kendas fitted in Marrakech while I still had a chance to test them on the trail, before heading back home across Spain. Out of town, as expected they initially felt odd on the road, like new knobblies can do. That settled down, hummed a bit more than the CSTs on smooth asphalt, but later on the dirt they felt too stiff at 30-psi road pressures (like many tubeless tyres), spinning out when stalled on a steep ascent, for example. I dropped to the mid/high 20s, but there felt little difference on the rocky or gravel tracks. Some bends I’d slice through like a pro, others I edged round like like a junior MX-er on their first day out.

On a heavy bike like the loaded 450 (195kg wet + gear) it can be hard to get your flow on some loose, stony bends. Meanwhile, on the few bits of deep sand (rare in Morocco), I did notice the 450 tracked well once you’d disabled the traction control. That’s as you’d expect with big blocks, though I think is also down to the 450’s unusually good steering and weight distribution.

On the road the Kendas still gave their moments: Once back on bendy mountain roads in southern Spain, I wasn’t cornering the way I could on the Ambros. A lot of this must be down to knobbly-on-asphalt syndrome: some rough or grooved surfaces set the tyres shimmying, even in a straight line. I’ve been used to that for decades and you just ride through this, but on the bends was another matter. Are the Big Blocks a knob too far?

Riding damp, winding mountain backroads from Seville to Granada, I had a couple of slips and at one point was so sure both tyres were punctured, I pulled over to check. Both were solid as. It wasn’t icy but I thought maybe I’d ridden through some unseen, oily agri-slime, or the dealer service in Seville the previous day had whacked up the pressures. Both tyres checked in at the regular 30psi.
On other occasions I thought perhaps the rubber needed to warm up in the chilly morning temps. This uneasiness came and went right across Spain until I thought: I can’t sell this bike with these Big Blocks, even if they make the bike look rufty-tufty and purposeful. Whoever buys it is likely to be a road rider. Once back in the UK I fitted some Mitas E07s (below) and will flog the Big Bs.

CFMoto 450MT • Quick suspension fix

CFMoto 450MT index page

Once I got to Morocco I rode a couple of 1000 clicks on tracks and trails before deciding yes, it was time to fiddle with the suspension settings which I’d not touched from new. Some tracks – made rougher by the September floods – were giving me a hammering. The suspension was too harsh as many reviewers attest, especially at the lower speeds I ride at. I did try one stony stage with tyres aired down to 26psi, but it didn’t seem to make much difference, TL tyres being natively stiffer. I didn’t want to go lower on the untried rims – though they’ve since proved to be up to the job. On one ride without my 15kg of travel baggage (above) the bike was nice and agile but even harsher on very rough ground without the extra load.

The CF has fully adjustable suspension and taking a cue from this ADVRider 450MT suspension thread, I should have started by setting the rear sag – a well-known metric for getting the rear suspension in the ballpark – but I didn’t. I never do. Instead I dialled back the shock’s combined compression/rebound knob (below left; no tool needed; nice) from 11 down to 3. I then backed off the fork rebound (left fork) and fork compression (right fork) by one turn and undid the fork preload with a 14mm by half a turn – and later did another half turn.

This was a definite improvement, especially on the trail. By now I was riding with £22k of top-of-the-range Desert X Rally, and an HP 1250GS with similarly sophisticated suspension. On the roughest trails I was unable or reluctant to keep up with them. Three times more hp may have helped, but the MT’s springs lacked the solid yet plush feel of the Ducati which I rode briefly and which lapped up anything that was thrown at it.

Kriega USD fork seal covers

So the stock set up is far from plush, but just a couple of minutes of easy tweaking has improved things a lot. The back end bottoms out now (as it should on the biggest hits) and the fork has done the same on a couple of fast ditch impacts. When I get back in February I may crank the rear preload up half a turn which should help tighten up the steering and reduce G-outs. Plus try dropping the tyres again to 25-ish.

As it is now the 450MT is not quite as good as my Rally Raid sprung 300L from last year, nor my factory set-up Hyperpro 650 XCountry, but both had €1-2000 of added springware. I’ve spent nothing on the MT, bar a few minutes on adjustments. It all just underlines what a well configured machine the MT is.

Pillion Peg Panniers: the Mis ing Link

Travel bikers rightly obsess over wet weights because on the road a bike will pile more weight on anyway. A well braced rear rack might add 4-5kg and when using soft baggage eliminates the chances of pipe melts. But these old school ‘racktangles’ are always too far back, probably to allow room for pillion riders’ legs. How often you you take a pillion on the trail?

Rackless designs mount directly on the bike, just like old-school throwovers derived from horse saddlebags. These days they can attach via a harness lashed to the pillion pegs and the tail rack. Where present, the melt/fire issue can be managed with heat guards on the pipe but depending on the bike, they can still be prone to swinging into the chain.
The only way to ensure this doesn’t happen is to mount them high, effectively on the side of the seat like the Kriega below left. But this negates the ethos of as low and forward as possible or ‘ALAFAP if you’re in a hurry. They may save rack weight but are still higher and farther back than ideal. OK for minimal loads but still bad for CoG and bike control.

But just about every bike has a solid structure designed to take way more weight than a loaded pannier and which is in just the right spot. Have you guessed what it is yet? Correct:

The pillion footrest!

I first tried resting a bag on a footrest on my top-heavy Africa Twin trip a few years ago. I loaded a small Lomo bag with tools; probably the heaviest item in my gear. The bike was still a tank because a kilo of tools makes little difference on a 230-kilo machine. But the positioning worked well.

For my CF Moto ride to Morocco I went one better and fitted the old Kriega OS18 (‘US20’) from the AT’s LHS tank-side down on the 450 MT’s LHS pillion peg. Old OS18s have a tab on the bottom for a zip-tie – the new OSs don’t. To spread the load when perched on the peg a lunchbox neatly filled the bag’s base, then I refitted the waterproof liner (below).

3P I’ll call them for now: Pillion Peg Panniers. You really couldn’t get any lower or more forward, but the bag sits securely, is still easy to access and doesn’t get in the way. It would be handy if the velcro’d-in white liner had carry handles to take stuff into a hotel easily, but Kriega must have thought of that years ago and expect you to use another carrier bag or remove the whole bag every night – a buckling faff.

This is where panniers should sit when not two-up.

I’d have done the same set-up on the other side but tbh, a shoulder strap Ortlieb tail pack attached to the back of the seat with a couple of ROK Straps is just so easy to whip off in seconds when popping in for a coffee with valuables not in my day pack.

Rhinowalk 20

Depends on the bike but I think a 20-litre sized bag is optimal for this application, sitting centrally on the peg and not sticking out or up too much.
You can get a Rhinowalk 20-L roll top (left) for 35 quid (it’s a lot more flimsy than a Kriega) and I used chunky TPU reusable RovaFlex Soft Ties. Like a London rat, I’m never more then 3 metres from a Rovaflex when on the road.

Assuming mounting soft bags on footrests with reusable zip ties is seen as a bodge, your rackless baggage makers ought to consider a redesigned harness that hooks to a pillion peg, has enough attachments to additionally strap to sub-frame rails, and is then counter tensioned in the usual way off the tail rack. Then make the bag q/d off that harness so there’s no faffing to fit/remove; just clip off and jog on. You’re welcome ;-).

Feedback 6000km later
This pillion-peg mounted set up worked much better than expected. Despite the scoffing from naysayers, there was never a moment in five weeks when I had to adjust the loose bag or when it got in the way getting on the bike or paddling through soft sand. It would be nice if it just clipped on like the Bumot rack set up on the 1250GS I rode with, but the whole thing could not have been lighter, more secure, better positioned or cheaper.

CFMoto 450MT – Actual Quick Look

CFMoto 450MT index page

My internet-sourced CFMoto 450MT preview last year has been a very popular post, and was even referenced by this repetitive, AI-generated review. Now the 450MTs are in UK showrooms, but most are long sold to the fearless early adopters who bought the bike unseen, months ago. I’ve made this mistake before and am not in a great rush, but had a chance to look over one in a packed storage shed at my LBS.

Impressions
It’s a whole lot of bike for £5699 with a 4-year warranty. You do wonder if that price is set to jump once it catches on. Alongside a Him 450 (which this shop also sold), the MT is clad in plastic like a 300 Rally vs a 300L. Sat on it, the ‘tank’ feels about 2 feet wide, reminding me of my Africa Twin. We don’t want that.
Behind the panels seems to be a lot of space and maybe some hidden ancillaries, where the Him has crash bars, but unlike the AT or 300L, the radiator looks protected.

As with the new Him, it looks long and low with a spacious feel which you hope will mean on-road comfort, but results in a lot of off-putting ‘visual mass’ to handle on the trail. I’d hope that impression may disappear once the bike gets ridden.
One fly in the ointment I’ve since learned is oil changes at 3000m/4500km and even new plugs at 6k. Oil capacity is 2.5L (full specs here) which seems to be adequate. Surely it’ll last longer than 3000 miles? Or is it a dodge to cover/pay for the 4-year warranty? My 300L was 8000 miles on 1.8 litres (though I didn’t leave it that long).
175-kg dry they say and swinging it side to side it didn’t feel top heavy, but I assume the tank was empty. The quality of the finish looks as good as anything from better known brands; there’s nothing cheap and shoddy here. Taking off some of those panels or the seat might reveal some rough edges, but it doesn’t look like it.

Attention to detail

  • Screen adjusts with big hand knobs, but only by 2-3 inches
  • Seat is long, low and wide, with a grippy surface texture
  • Clutch is very light
  • Single front disc is big
  • Stock wheels are tubeless and seem to look good
  • Rear shock has relatively easy to get to preload adjustment rings
  • Thin plastic handguards are flimsy
  • Both gear and brake lever fold
  • Mirrors pivot in easily
  • Wide footrests
  • Bashplate is thin pressed steel with a few too many slots, but has a flat base for added protection. There’s also a whole lot of space up front – for a rally-style water tank?
  • Tyres are CST Ambro A4 – no, never heard of them either
  • Pipe is as tucked in as it can be

With wall-to-wall rave reviews, I was set on a 450 Himalayan in tubeless for about £6300, despite the hideous graphics (which might have hair-driered off). I still think the Him would feel easier to manage on the trails, like a 300L. But once you factor in the irresistible appeal of a 270° twin, swinging a leg over and pressing the button takes on a whole new thrill.

Himalayan 450 vs 450MT

  • The weight, power and tank volume are about the same
  • I imagine the Him’s economy will be a bit better
  • I prefer a rectangular dash and can live without engine modes
  • MT is loads cheaper

Himalayan 450 lacks
Adjustable screen
TL wheels on base models
Handguards
Fully adjustable suspension

CF450MT lacks
Centre stand and tank crash bars
Proper handguards
Ride-by-wire/engine modes (good)
Naff graphics (also good)

Tbh, that list was scrapping the barrel. Both of these are two of the best real-world travel bikes we have at the moment, but the Him costs 10% more in tubeless. Having seen one up close, there’s nothing I’d revise in last year’s preview.