Author Archives: Chris S

Serow Touring XT250 1000 mile review

Serow index page

tik

• Economy: often over 100mpg so 300km range from the 9.3-litre tank
• 19hp was never really an issue, even at 11,000′ (when it became 12hp)
• Looks good
• As light as you’ll get for a regular trail bike
• Windscreen frame enabled near eye-level Garmin mounting which made a difference
• Came well equipped with racking and TL rear wheel
• Seat is low
• Starts and fuels with no fuss whatsoever
• No vibration through bars or pegs
Mosko bags did the job unobtrusively

cros

• Something was wrong with the front end
• I’m too big for this bike and couldn’t stand comfortably (common issue)
• Seat (or pants) needs added padding
• Some days the TL rear tyre lost air, some it didn’t
• Ultra basic and barely legible LCD display
• Bigger footpegs needed a longer shifter with big boots/feet
• Front TL Kenda Big Block too stiff for this light bike

Review
On reflection, I was a bit slack preparing my Serow. It ticked so many boxes and was a ‘XT’ after all, so I assumed it would do the job, like most XTs do. But after 10 days on the High Atlas Traverse (H.A.T) I can see how it could be improved for off roading.
Ascending the first dirt track – one I’ve done many times on many bikes – I could feel something was wrong. The front end flapped around rather than tracked straight like the Him 450 I last rode. It took a while to work out it was probably a combination of too stiff Kenda TL tyre at too high psi, plus probably what’s left of decade old fork oil.

They say 250 Serow forks in particular are not so hot, but I was fooled by them being firm (they never bottomed out). They also say a $400 Cogent spring, oil and valve kit fixes that and – as a Serow owner I know will affirm – add their $800 shock and you’re sorted.

I now see RaceTech (also in the US) sell just the cartridge emulating valves (left) for around $230 + all the usuals, while in the UK Brooks sell similar Thai YSS valves for £84. I’ve read of these emulators without actually understanding exactly how they work but after watching this RT installation vid, I get it. Seeing as the forks are apart for a new seal and gaiter, I may give the YSS valves a shot.
Back in Morocco, even once the front tyre was dropped to 19psi, a lot of energy was spent keeping this thing on line on the steep, loose climbs of the H.A.T. Luckily, minimal weight and the easy-going motor producing its own ‘traction control’ made this possible. And elsewhere the Serow was fine.
I have to say the explanation still sounds a bit thin. I’m sure I’ve ridden ill-damped and poorly tyred bikes before, but something – maybe rearward weight distribution or my weight overall? – was off, though I was nowhere near the 160kg max payload stated in the manual. I see one bloke fitted an ebay steering damper to his Serow. They do say pricey off-road dampers like the Scott are enhancements rather than there to disguise unstable steering. I dismissed the notion that the weight of the hefty front rack and screen were an issue (that wrapped bundle is only a 500g bike cover, fyi). Really, it’s got to be a grand of Cogent springing that transforms the Serow – as did a grand’s worth on the CRF 300L.

Sorted, carb’d TTR350 was dynamically loads better but ‘only’ did 75mpg, and you can see how much taller it is

Still, it’s amazing how adequate 19hp turned out to be – especially when vanned all the way down to KM Zero! Even up in the H.A.T Death Zone where only hardy microbes survive, the XT was never left wanting, even if it couldn’t pull beyond first at 10,000′. All motors lose power at altitude, but I like to think it’s the reliably even fuel injection which makes the scant power effective.
This lowly output must have contributed to economy of up to 108mpg or over 38kpl. An all-time record for me. The worst was about 88/31 and the average was 98/34.7, though exact figures probably got muddied by village fuel top-ups.

Dropping outriggers and getting on – no problemo

The soft, low-down power meant the gearing didn’t feel under any strain, though 1st to 2nd had a bit of a gap and a 6th would have been nice. The narrow rear Anakee Wild was well matched for the pace and load and probably helped keep the mpg in three figures.

Near identical and new non-Euro XT250s are easily rented in Morocco, but have tubes all round.

Having ridden ABS for years, I think my once finely honed braking finesse has suffered. Part of the problem was I was so squashed up that, unless sitting right back and upsetting the ride balance even more, my feet point down so that accurately modulating the rear brake was more than my Sidi clad ankles could do. Well, that’s my excuse. Were the seat a lot taller the knee angle would open up and go back and the feet would level off. And though I rarely stand, when you need to you must, but even with the risers fitted the stoop was not sustainable. Higher bars would need longer cables – a faff. And along with the stoop the suspension probably didn’t inspire confidence to stand up and attack (that and a very sore leg from a needless lowside).

Another ergo problem I’ve never had before was caused by fitting bigger pegs for better standing support. It reduces the peg to shifter space (below) which, with brick-like Sidi Adventures, makes up-shifting awkward. But it seems I’m not the first to notice this and adjustable shifters are available (below right). My oh my it’s amazing what you learn after a few full days on the trail!

As noted on previous AMH project bikes, stock suspension is commonly only adequate and technically dead simple to improve, compared to a motor. But I think I prefer the feel of a low-comp but injected air-cooled engine over a CRF, just like I preferred the CRF over the highly strung WR250R. The Serow has a mellow donkey feel which suits my slow/remote exploring prefs these days.

Serow 19hp and 140kg; TTR350 29hp and the same; KTM 390 170kg and 44hp.

Shaky front end apart, the Serow fulfilled its intended purpose: an easy bike to manage the unknown trails of the H.A.T. It started on the button, fuelled cleanly and never missed a beat, like all good Yams. In places on the H.A.T, last year’s 450MT would have too much to handle. But while it could be easily improved, the Serow’s still a bit small for me.

Quo Vadis
Quo what? A KTM 490 X or R perhaps? or I wonder if I should take another spin on a Himalayan 450, a bike I expected to like but didn’t. It’s certainly my size and has great range, but manages to clock in with nearly 50% more weight. Not much you can do about that and it does take it out of you over a day on the piste (improved suspension might ease the beating). I may try and rent one again. At least by this time the stock CEAT tyres ought to have been replaced.

A more stupid idea is adapting Honda’s air-cooled and injected GB350S (above left) into a travel bike. Everyone seems to love this 21-hp, Indian-built Honda ‘Bullet’. But I can guaran-damn-tee, I won’t be able to stand up on that without apehangers. And while supposedly as economical as the Serow, it weighs 178kg. I’ve never actually seen one; maybe it’s also too small for me.
That motor’s been around for years but when hiding behind retro styling you can get away with a low output. So not much chance of them spinning off a soft Adv, like Triumph have done with the more highly strung Scrambler 400XC (above right). The XC is also tubeless but is only 10kg lighter than a Him 450, won’t have anywhere near the economy or range and costs nearly double the GB. Both are tubeless. How lucky we are to have all these choices.

A high elevation, low-speed blur…

BMW F650GS in the Black Rock Desert

Originally published in Motorcycle Monthly in 2012, I just dug this out from the archive. It’s of interest as it describes how I came to choose the meaty part of Stage K of today’s Trans Morocco Trail, one of the trickier desert sections of the coast-to-coast ride. There’s more on the F650GS here. For a big bike I quite liked it. Long, low and easy to live with, as they nearly used to say.

There’s always a sense of trepidation when you set off alone on an unknown desert track on an untried bike. The bike’s performance and set-up are added uncertainties. I’d done the first few miles of this route before, but once the creek passed a well and took a gnarly climb onto an escarpment I was on new ground.
Left led north: I’d done that one before and had recently read about a guy on a DR who’d fried his clutch and in a panic called the British Embassy for help. A complicated and costly recovery followed. Hoping for better luck, I took the right fork towards the Algerian border. The coarse limestone bedrock kept speeds down, but the way was clear.
Up ahead flat-topped hills stacked up to the northeast but soon the helpful line of the Olaf [early digital] map dropped off the screen and I was back to pre-GPS nav, watching my orientation and seeking the most used track.

This trip was a couple of years before the Garmin 610 Montana came out which, in tandem with free OSM-based mapping, changed the whole game for desert nav. Iirc there were no such things as verified gpx tracklogs to show the way, there were only waypoint and the famous Olaf Maroc Topo map which was somehow complied by a German digital mapping enthusiast using submitted tracklogs. Tricking a pre-Montana Garmin GPS unit into displaying Olaf needed a visit from a tech-bro (in the old, non-billionaire-libertarian sense). Only on this trip I realised that not all of these user-submitted tracks where genuine recordings, they appeared to have been drawn from online sat imagery. Sadly, a similar situation exists with OSM today (at least in Morocco, to which I contribute): lashings of discontiguous, user-generated junk so you can’t see the track for the traces.

My plan for the second edition of my Morocco Overland guidebook was to sweep across the Kingdom from the east, much like the Muslim hordes some 1300 years ago, but causing much less of a disturbance. I’d log new routes from the Rekkam plateau in the east to the Reguibat tribal outlands of the Western Sahara, adding whatever took my fancy along the way.
My own Suzuki GS500-based overlander was barely complete so I planned to rent out of Marrakech, but BMW Motorrad UK stepped up with a new F650GS SE twin, the modern iteration of my Suzuki project. According to my calculations the 650 ought to be the ideal Moroccan tourer: fast and comfy enough to bang out the
European stage, and an adequate dirt tracker once I got there.

Enter sand man
Most are attracted to the better-looking 800 model, but the confusingly named F650GS is actually the same 795cc motor, detuned by 15% to 71hp peaking some 1200rpm down the rev band. Suspension travel is shorter and with a 19in front wheel that makes the seat lower too. Tyres are tubeless and the gearing is said to be from the F800ST road bike, the only flaw on the piste.
At the first service at Vines in Guildford a smaller front sprocket was fitted because swapping cogs was not a roadside job. A bash plate, hand guards and engine bars were also fitted, and Metal Mule supplied a rack, tall screen and radiator guard. With the Tourances replaced with a set of lumpiuer Heidenau K60s and some Enduristan throwovers, I was good to go.
Now we were finally on the piste and so far so good. The track headed south back to the escarpment edge. Far below in the haze lay my destination, the dune-basher’s Mecca of Erg Chebbi, Morocco’s only distinctive sand sea. Just 20 miles long, they come to gaze in wonder at its forms or test themselves on its rosy flanks. I knew that once I dropped off the escarpment within sight of an Algerian border fort and headed towards Chebbi, things would get sandy; that’s rare for Morocco and hard work on 230 kilos of bike.
Sure enough, as the mid-afternoon heat peaked I found myself pushing alongside the GS in first, the tall gear churning the back wheel as the bike inched across the sands. Experimenting with the K60s still at road pressures, this was to be expected, so the slightest forward progress was better than losing momentum. It was only an hour or two’s effort but that was enough to drain me, and as I neared the firm gravel plains alongside the Erg, I unzipped my sweat-drenched jacket and cruised around lazily from one auberge (desert lodge) to another until one took my fancy.

I’ve done enough of these short adventure rides to know that at some point a spanner as long as a pool cue would be thrown through my spokes. That reversal had already come and gone so I felt myself in the clear. On berthing at the Moroccan port of Nador I noticed my tailpack of camping and riding gear was missing. It was one of the ferry crew for sure, but my protests were in vain; they blamed the passengers and I blamed my laissez faire attitude towards security. All that really mattered: GPS, maps, iPad and other valuables I’d kept with me for the six-hour crossing. I was fuming of course, but the mission had not been compromised. I just wouldn’t be camping as I’d hoped, and the bike would be a little lighter.

Black Rock Desert
Encouraged by the low-seated 650 and the K60 tyres, I was ready to tackle a trickier stage I’d spent months preparing for. West of Erg Chebbi, between the N12 highway and the popular M6 route along the Algerian border, close scrutiny of Google Earth revealed a network of possible tracks. Unmarked on most maps and restrained by convoluted topography, many tracks ended at mines that scoured the blackened mountainsides which gave the region its name: sahra aswad sakhar (I made that up). I wanted to cut through the middle to the west, but was unsure how- or if it all linked up. One route looked like it might work out, but somewhere I’d need to cross the desert course of the Oued Rheris river.

A few days earlier I’d passed close to the source of the Rheris up in the High Atlas. A tip from a local auberge owner had led me up a mountain track cut by the legionnaires in the 1930s high above a narrow gorge to evade ambushes by the as yet unpacified Berbers. Up at over 2200m in the sleet (above), the 650’s computer had read just 1ºC; and today down at Erg Chebbi overnight winds had smothered the skies with a desert haze that might bring rain.
Crammed between desert, ocean and mountain, erratic Moroccan weather can throw everything at you during a springtime fortnight. It was going to be an adventure for sure, nosing out a way though the valleys and around the escarpments of the BRD, but hopefully something would come of it.
The great thing about riding in Morocco is that distances are short by the Saharan standards on which I cut my teeth in the 1980s. Few tracks exceed 200 kilometres between fuel or towns so there’s no need for extra tanks or – luckily this time – even camping gear. Follow a likely looking track and it’s bound to lead somewhere. It might be a dusty mine site or a stone clad Berber village, clinging to a canyon side and barely changed since medieval times.

I rode south past Erg Chebbi (above) as the forerunners of the Rallye Aicha des Gazelles tore along the base of the dunes. At the village of Taouz I set off on my own one-man rally, which initially required crossing the flood plain of another big desert river, the Oued Ziz. Three years ago on my Ténéré, the Ziz had been flowing past Erg Chebbi fit for rafting, nixing my chances of getting into the desert noire. This time round I had a few moments as the BMW sank into the chalky mud; getting mired within sight of the village would not be a great start to the day, and I reminded myself to take some air out of the tyres.
On the far side a moped-mounted tout soon zoned in and offered his services but I was determined to work it out myself. As is often the case, tracks can be confusing near a settlement, and after a bit of blundering with my moped mate never far behind (“ooh, you don’t want to go that way, chum…”) I picked up a likely trajectory to the northwest.

The track forked and reconverged around obstacles, a common trait in open deserts that can unnerve the inexperienced. After a few miles it picked up a bigger piste that had been pulverised into a flour-like powder by mine trucks. Even here the K60s kept their composure and I came to a junction where a passage led to an abandoned village I’d spotted on Google Earth. Down in a dry creek below the ruins I marked a waypoint and the depth of a well for the book, and rode on, taking any track that erred west. Stopping frequently to mark each junction, I came to a gap in the range (above) where the main track led north to the Rissani, a fall back destination if things didn’t go to plan. At this point a lesser route swung directly west into the Black Rock.

Cry me a river
The fast track soon swung off to the south, probably a service route for the village of Remlia on route M6. Heading there was another contingency should I get stuck, because I knew that up ahead the state of the Rheris would make or break my day. I lit off westwards cross-country and after a few miles picked up another track.
The valley narrowed and I squeezed through a sandy passage that in turn led to a basin, a kind of inland delta or reservoir filled when the Rheris was in flood. Soon I was jostling the GS over the salt-capped mounds of crusted mud, and with a fright, felt the GS sink and slow to the mud below. I dashed directly for the edge of the basin where firmer tracks skirted the hillside.

The baked rim of the muddy delta led over a rocky pass to a field of small dunes where the track ended abruptly on a flood-carved riverbank (above). Down below a ribbon of water separated me from the far side and another field of small dunes which stretched on who knew how far. I turned the running GS into the wind to cool off, hung my heavy jacket and lid on the bars and slithered down the sandy bank to the water’s edge. One thing was for sure, once l rode down that sandy bank there was no getting back up. This was a one-way trip to whatever lay beyond. At the river the water was only ankle high and the bed was firm; I could ride through this. But up ahead a long sandy ramp rose away from the channel and would sap the 650’s traction. I walked up and decided that it too was doable, then waded back to the bike, dropped a couple more pounds from the Heidenaus and paddled down the bank and through the water.

On the far side I paddled the GS hard up the sandy ramp with the engine pinking, tyre spinning and the fan whirring fit for takeoff. I kept at it until the terrain relented and I was out of the dunes. Up ahead a well caught my eye, the first I’d seen since the morning. I pulled up for a breather and kneeled by the camel trough for a cooling splash and a snack. An hour or so later a final expanse of sand led me out of the Black Rock’s escarpments and onto a sandy plain.
I ignored what tracks there were and instead rolled west cross-country towards a distinctive peak where I was sure a haul road led back north to the N12 highway. At one point a local guy joined me on his 125 and we diced in the dirt until he spun off on some unknown shortcut.
I’d taken a chance and my mini-adventure had panned out. I’d found a way through the Black Rock. It’s commonly said that the era of grand exploration is long past. That may be so, but the thrill of taking on the unknown, be it a transcontinental ride or just a day in the desert, is why they call it adventure motorcycling.

Quick Spin: 2025 KTM 390 Enduro R in Morocco

For a bike with the world-weary A-word in its name, I wasn’t that impressed with the 390SW rental we tried in Morocco in early 2025 (left): a naked, low-barred road bike with tubed tyres. For unsupported trail touring it was the worst of all worlds.
Emerging from their their annus horribilis, for 2025 KTM have brought out a 390 Adventure X (below left) for just £5400, a higher and better sprung Adventure R for £6100, and an Enduro R trail bike for £5700 with the same R-level springs. Meanwhile the 2024 Adventures are currently being very heavily discounted from their formerly high prices and presumably, once they’re gone they’re gone.

MODELAdventure SW
(2024)
Adventure
(2024)
Adventure X
(2025)
Adventure R
(2025)
Enduro R
(2025)
Weight170kg173176176165
Tank14.5 litres14.514149
Seat855mm855825870890
Wheels17/1917/19 cast TL17/19 cast TL18/2118/21
Suspension170/177mm170/177200/200230/230230/230
Price UK£5600£5200£5400£6100£5700

All data above copied from KTM UK and unverified. Both 2024 models are heavily discounted

Here we have Bob’s brand new 390 Enduro R with a 9-litre tank and a 890mm (35″) seat height. It’s supposedly only 5kg lighter than an Adv SW, but has more and better suspension travel, a basic display, all costs nearly the same.

Bob’s spanking Indian-made Enduro R arrived just in time for him to run it in, sling some throwovers onto an Indian-made rack and roll it into Simon’s van. A few days later it got rolled out near the start of my new High Atlas Traverse at the Tizi n Test pass. I was on my 250 Serow (830mm seat, 9.6L tank, 139kg wet) and Simon had his over-bored 350 TTR (890 seat, 14L tank, 145kg wet).

Bob is 6′ 4″ (1.93m) so the yard-high Enduro R didn’t really bother him. I realise it’s actually the same seat height as my old 300L from two bikes ago. A only 6′ 1″ no wonder it bugged me. He brought an 11-litre fuel bag which we needed a couple of times. I seem to recall he got up to mid-70s mpg (27kpl) which gavce a pretty good 250-km range a tad better than Simon’s carb’d TTR, but way behind my Serow which got well over 100mpg a couple of times. The KTM makes twice the power of the Serow.

I had a quick spin on revised Stage N of the TMT for as long as it took Bob to needlessly fall off my Serow on a switchback. Sadly, my bike had that tendency (more here soon) so with better suspension it’s no surprise I liked the KTM more than my Serow, but not as much as Simon’s custom-barrelled 350 TTR. The masses of extra power didn’t really come into it on the trail.

Good suspension rolled over rough stuff with no deflection or correction needed by the rider, the cable clutch was much nicer, and the bike quickshifts up and down from new (no unlocking required). I found this worked better on the dirt than on the road a few days later, but by then my ankle wasn’t pivoting like it should. For once I could stand up properly, and for a KTM the seat looked hard but felt pretty good and Bob never complained (I wore – and needed – Moto Skiveez most days on the Serow). A bit of air could have been lost from the tyres for a softer ride all round. I didn’t get into the KTM on the road so much. Everything felt typically KTM-hard and Bob was often shaking out his vibration-numbed hands, though I didn’t notice this on my brief spin at <100kph. A few more miles may have changed my opinion.

If it was me, I’d probably get the bargain-priced Adventure X at £5400; it’s lower, has a bigger tank plus a screen and tubeless cast wheels. Would I soon regret the unadjustable fork, basic emulsion shock and 19-inch front over the nimble Enduro R or full spec Adventure R? We may never know, but for £6100 the full-spec Adventure R is more bike for your money if doing more challenging dirt riding and weighs 20 kilos less than my 450MT, but lacks the charismatic engine. Apart from the inner tubes, for easy trails and roads, I’d say the X marks the spot.

Tested: Mosko Moto Alpine R60 Rackless review

See also
Soft Baggage 2026
Serow Index page

Everything in two, well positioned big bags

In a line
Mounted separately and semi-permanently to a light rack and without rear duffle – not as Mosko intended – but was exactly what I wanted.

Price and verified weights
Bags £476.
Right side 1350g; left 1530g; hardware 130g, Duffle 650g. Total: 3.7kg/8.1lbs
Gnoblin q/d mount (optional; £39) 182g.
As mounted (no duffle or Gnoblin): 2.5kg

  • Mounts low and forward, ideal shape for optimal load distribution
  • Well put together and clever design elements
  • Light: my adapted set-up just 2.5kg
  • Looks more than 22 litres per side
  • The outward flex of the CURV board (not used) limits pressure on sidepanels
  • With CURV board sits high on some bikes
  • If you want the q/d element make sure the CURV board suits your bike
  • OTT strap hard to cinch down with changing bag volumes

Alpine R60s supplied free by Mosko for testing and review

What they say
The Alpine 60L Rackless is Mosko Moto’s lightest weight dual sport and ADV luggage setup with the capacity for multi-day trips. Designed for riders who seek minimalist, lightweight luggage, it provides the three-bag organization and packing system of a traditional pannier setup (two side panniers and a rear duffle) in a lightweight, waterproof, abrasion-resistant ripstop nylon rackless bag. Featuring our super durable CURV® chassis, the universally-mounting A60 can be easily swapped between multiple bikes, and can be packed and checked for fly-to-ride adventures.

Alpine Style
For this autumn’s recce of the High Atlas Traverse I wanted to try something different. Though never a fan of the one-piece Giant Loop Coyotes and the like, I’ve been interested in separate throwover side-bags which can manage without a full racktangle™ (right). I also like the idea of tough drybags sleeved in a holster, as on Mosko’s Rackless 40 and 80, although these look a bit heavy and over-designed for my little Yam 250 on this trip.
You should make something in between the 40 and 80, and simpler‘, I suggested to Roel as Mosko EU.
Give it a month or two and I’ll have our new Alpine 60L to show you‘, he replied.

A week before wheels-up and Mosko’s Alpine R60 arrive in Woodland Green and Black. Two sidebags of 22 litres (but look bigger), plus a 15-litre top duffle which I didn’t plan to use. Each bag comes mounted on a bendy, two-piece U-shaped composite CURV® backplate which you bolt together with supplied hardware. That straps to the bike at the pillion pegs or rear downtube, to be tensioned from the tail rack, either with an optional and neat peg called a Gnoblin (below), or just a strap or two. Result: a quickly detachable 3-point fitting using the backplate to part-stabilise the load. Mosko are pitching the Alpine 60s at the harder-riding, ‘light-is-right’, crowd, but anyone who appreciates a minimalist, light throwover that’s easily removable will like the R60.

The clever thing about the composite CURV® plate to which each bag is semi-permanently buckled, is that the flexible board naturally bows outwards to resist pressing on the sides of the bike causing rubbing; a quasi-rack. A replaceable, full-length, 8-mil EVA foam pad is velcro’d to the plate. The bags come securely anchor-buckled to the plate which is velcro’d to the EVA pad. To avoid pipeburn use the Mosko heatshield, at only £22 it’s cheaper and neater than a C-channel off-cut and clips.
Set up this way, removing the whole rig is a 10-second job (discounting the duffle), while secure mounting in the morning might take as long as 30 seconds, so make sure to set the alarm. I’ll take q/d soft bags if they have a bombproof and foolproof attachment system which can be used daily without thinking too much. Otherwise, most nights in Morocco I leave partly loaded bags on the securely parked bike and bring what I need into the room.

Too far back as usual… sigh

My Serow Touring came stock with an old-school alloy tube tailrack and light-gauge steel side frames (left) which are way too far back as usual, but otherwise ideal for stabilising the low weights I typically carry in Morocco, lodging each night, as I do. Out of the box I could see issues fitting the Alpine 60s onto my racking, but could also see a solution.

Looking at the vid above. Either those bags are full to overflowing, or the stiffness of the flexible backplate means they sit high on that Kove, even without the duffle which might be hidden from view.
The A60 is a rackless system” says our man Coleman at 0:52, but at that point you can see the Kove has been fitted with a CNC FishRacing integrated full rack system (right), or the 25-quid Ali-X knock-off. It’s much wider than my Serow set up which may explain why the bags sit so high. I’m not a fan of this current, easily cut (aka: cheap) CNC trend, when hand-formed and braised tubing uses less metal for half the weight (rant ends ;-).
As said the R60 baggage appears to sit high on the racked Kove, but it also does in the Mosko video (below), fitted to a Moroccan T7 rental with only a tail rack. I think it’s a seat-width thing. As we know modern pipes are huge.

There are some long-winded R60 video reviewers out there. MoskoPete is not one of them. Job done in 3:29.

Last year I tried to fit the Kriega OS-Base Universal harness (below left) for my 450MT but the one-piece grab handles/tail rack got in the way. I could have swapped in an aftermarket CNC tail rack (and lost the handy handles), or cut a hole in the harness for the alloy handle to pass through, before rebolting.
I liked the idea of being able to lash anything to the harness, not just Kriega’s OS bags, but again, their fitted bags seem to sit high, effectively resting on the side of the seat (below right) to limit swinging about in the rack-free void below. This is the weak spot of the rackless idea on monoshockers: the side panels become a necessary but over-high support point.
For me the ethos has long been as low and forward as possible – or ‘AL&FAP if you’re in a hurry. These set ups may save rack weight, but are higher and further back than ideal. With minimal loads it’s not critical, but it’s not great for CoG and bike control, especially weaving around off road, picking up or when getting out of shape.

This is where panniers should sit when not two-up.

I returned the Kriega harness and went with the usual tailpack-sat-on-a-tailpack, plus my novel and as yet unrecognised 3P idea, as well as small tankside bags on radiator crash bars (left). Baggage ends up all over the bike which is handy for daytime access and organisation, but a bit of a faff to bring it all in overnight (if necessary), plus a messy look.

Up at 3200 metres on the High Atlas Traverse

This time I wanted to try everything in one place. I could see the R60s might not sit well on my bike but I liked the bag shape more than the q/d feature. The R60’s ‘short sock’ shape potentially puts loads in the right place. Heavy or rarely used Items like tools and tubes can go it the bag’s ‘toe’; light stuff up top with all the rest in between.

I test mounted the unjoined Alpines with zip ties; holes pre-cut into the CURV-plate make this easy. After seeing that it could all fit very well, I removed the bags and sawed off the rear parts of the plate and EVA pad, making two separate panniers. I then taped and zip-tied the trimmed board and foam (below left) and re-attached each 1.25-kilo bag using the much shortened strap to the front of the pillion peg hanger and at three more points along the upper edge of the board with reusable TPU RovaFlex SoftTies (below right) which adorn just about all of my outdoor gear.

By chance, the bag’s lowest point also rested on the Serow’s unfolded pillion peg, additionally supporting heavy weights positioned in that area, reviving my unsung 3P idea mentioned above and effectively giving up to five contact points per side.

The 50-mil OTT-straps anchored themselves through a gap in my tail rack (left) to pull the bags close in against the rack. There was no need to run an additional strap around the whole bag and rack to hold it in, as Adv Spec suggest with their Magadans.
As it’s set up now, the seat can be removed as normal, the side panel can be accessed by undoing the pillion strap and lifting each bag. For insecure overnight parkings, I just fill a light 70-litre sack with what I need for the night.

All in all, the trimmed R60s could not have fitted better: secure, low, forward and as light as you’ll get for the volume and durability.
In Morocco a couple of tumbles didn’t affect the bags, though we didn’t have any pelting rain to test the waterproofing. On the road load volumes vary from day to day depending on what you’re wearing an so on. So the only complaint I have was that it was hard to cinch down the 50-mm male metal anchor buckle to pull the top down tightly. The strap was jammed too tight. It was more easily done on the upper part of the strap which is less intuitive for a good yank. Other than that, the OTT strap and two clips per side made things easily to access during the day. You soon learn to pack a day-access bag on one side so the other can be left till the evening. Everything in several pouches or bags shoved down inside easily, using all the space.
Once I get the Serow sorted, I’m looking forward to taking out the R60 for another run.

Yamaha Serow ready for the High Atlas Traverse

Serow index page

It didn’t take much, but my 250 Serow Touring is ready to wheel into a van and head down to Morocco for a recce of the High Atlas Traverse (left).
The H.A.T is a new route I’ve cooked up to parallel our very popular, coast-to-coast Trans Morocco Trail. When the H.A.T map and tracklogs are up, they’ll be hosted on the same TMT website.

Following the Atlas watershed over the highest motorable peaks and passes for 900km, the H.A.T will probably become harder than the TMT. With elevations exceeding 12,000′, we’re not certain every planned track will be passable, but that’s why they call it a recce. Whatever happens, my lithe, low-saddled Serow ought to be ideal for the task, joined by Simon on his TTR 333 and Bob on a brand new KTM 390 Enduro R to add some Vit C to the photos.
I’ll be posting the odd photo on the TMT Insta page and maybe elswhere. If it all pans out, the route will be online to download for free by the New Year.