Tag Archives: serow 250 forks

Serow 250: fitting £90 fork emulators

Serow Index Page

When I think back to my early travels, the idea of doing anything more than just jacking up the shock to carry the load never occurred to me. With suspension, it has to be pretty terrible for you to notice, and for that to happen – or for good stuff to show it’s worth – you need to be either riding pretty fast, or hammering over rough terrain. If you don’t do much of either or don’t have up to a grand to spare (or have good, fully adjustable forks) it’s probably not worth it. But for under £100 it’s possible to improve a non-adjustable fork’s damping action. And my Serow could do with some of that.

Can’t be bothered to read another word, but still curious? Watch the 12-min vid at the bottom

On our H.A.T recce in Morocco last November (left), right off the bat the Serow’s front end was all over the place on stony trails. Notably worse than other bikes I’d ridden lately. It never bottomed out and the back end wasn’t sagging, so I presumed it was a combination of too stiff front tyre and especially poor damping, that inscrutable function which controls spring rebound.
Spend a grand plus taxes on a full, US-imported Cogent front and rear Serow set up‘ they said. ‘Night and day or your money back!’ Cogent also did just a fork kit with emulator valves, replacement springs and oil for around $400. I didn’t need a spring or oil, just valves, and would end up with better, but still unadjustable forks. Next stop were Race Tech Gold Valves for $230 (FEGV 3311). Still quite a lot with import tax and all. You’ll find much online chat about the pros and cons of Cogent vs Race Tech emulators.
Long story short, widely UK-sold YSS also do a range of emulator valves for just 90 quid (below). They’re not gold, but as I needed a new fork seal anyway, it seemed worth a shot to DIY, even though I’d never taken forks apart before.

I’d heard of emulators but wasn’t really sure what they were. Turns out they’re easily fitted valves which enable conventional, archaic damper rod forks to ’emulate’ supposedly superior cartridge forks (Cart-what? For another time).
The valve (above left) is an adjustable spring loaded plunger which sits between the fixed damper rod and the fork spring (right). As forks compress, oil is pushed through the valve, opening the spring which is otherwise closed. Oil flows through progressively relative to force, compared to crude, static conventional damping rods with just a couple of drilled holes controlling flow. The vid below made Race Tech installation on an XT500 look relatively easy.
You need a set with a diameter that slips snuggly down your fork tube. For a Serow it wasn’t possible to find that info online, and guessing from the fork tube outer ø is just that (I now know…). The best way to verify your fork tube’s internal ø is to undo the fork cap, lift out the spacer/spring, and measure ID with some verniers. On the Serow fork ID was ~30mm – not my 31mm estimate. The 31s got sent back for exchange but never made it. By chance I found some used next-size-down YSS 29s on ebay for half price. Weeks passed by for all these fascinating events to occur.

If only it was all like the slick vid below in a well lit and superbly equipped workshop with dinky music tinkling in the background. Whip out the springs, tip out the effortlessly unscrewed rod, pop in the new valves and reverse the rest before damping progressively into the sunset. My damper rods didn’t slip out nicely, so the entire fork leg needed to be disassembled.
Unless going Cogent, you need to get your hands on the damper rod because additional holes must be drilled for oil to pass unfettered up to the new emulator valve. A hex bolt at the base of the fork secures the damper rod inside the lower fork. But they’re notoriously tricky to remove because it’s like trying to undo a bolt from an unseen nut without any means of restraining the nut.

More tools to buy. Sigh…

‘Get a rattle gun’ I was advised (left; pneumatic impact driver), to ‘shock’ the allen bolt from the damper rod to which it’s been seized for the last 15 years.
I had a compressor tank and found a 25 quid rattler on ebay – ker-ching. But air gun shock therapy wasn’t working. The rod was spinning inside – as you’d expect. A ha, I thought, I will ram a whittled stick in the other end to stop the rod spinning, lock it off with some Moles (below left), then apply rattle. That worked – eventually, but on reassembly it didn’t, so I deployed the ‘broom trick’ I’d seen mentioned online. Same idea: slide it down the fork tube and press against to the damper rod, then pull the trigger. Long arms needed. All this seemed a bit less faff than entirely reassembling the fork (as in the vid) to add tension to the rod for removal/refitting.

Much faffing later, I had the forks in bits by which time I realised I could have fitted the new fork seal myself, not at the LBS.

Emulator ringed alongside damper rod prior to drilling. Fork spring spacer up top

To maintain your fork spring effective length/preload (FSEL/P) and not void your insurance, you need to saw off the height of the valve’s body – about an inch – from the spacer tubes so it all fits back together again (below). A fairly easy job even I find hard to mess up.

Next job was drilling several extra flow holes in the damper rods which normally have just a couple near the bottom. Like much of the Serow, this is 1970s technology, maybe older, but I suppose it works well enough. More holes let the oil move quickly up to the sprung emulator valve which controls the variable flow. Another thing I learned: on my forks the drilled rods pass through a close-fitting nylon collar at some stage, so any protruding burrs from the drilling lock the action so need to be ground right off to slide through the collar smoothly.
By now Christmas had come and gone, so had New Year and there were already chocolate eggs in the shops. But I was getting close and the forks slid smoothy in and out, like they should. I did the ‘broom trick’ as mentioned above to tighten the rods back onto the fork leg with the air gun, and was so amazed it worked, I stopped right there and took the rest of the day off before another cock up kicked me in the nuts.

“Refitting is the reverse sequence to removal.” to quote M Haynes, and amazingly, only one bolt had escaped in the weeks it took to complete a simple one-day task. But let’s snatch a bit of positive: I’d leaned about fork internals. Having avoided fork disassembly all these decades, I can now see they’re not so complicated. Amazingly, a simple circlip appears to hold the two parts of a leg together. Undo that and whack the two sections apart like a Christmas cracker to get to the seal or damper rod. Along with rod removal, refitting a seal without damage without the correct slide tool is probably the hardest job.
Deciding on fork oil weight and volume/height is another chance to tie yourself in knots of self doubt. I found several values online for the ‘XT250’ until I realised just measure the volume of watery, brown muck which poured out of the non-leaky leg – 350cc. In fact I poured in just 300cc of 10W, thinking it’d be easier to add more if something felt very off, rather than try and suck some out.

By the time I reached this climactic stage, the Serow’s previous owner got in touch asking whether I might like to sell it back. Someone must have told her I was a serial bike quickshifter! With Morocco snowed out and me elsewhere this winter, a deal was made, a date was set. I topped up the rear tubeless tyre and took the Serow out for one last ride along Purbeck’s flooded lanes.
The forks felt the same – fine on normal roads, as before. No great surprise. I’d need to find a rocky climb to see if the front responded any better, but right now what few local lanes I knew around here where probably knee-deep in mud and rotting leaf sludge.

So I puttered merrily around the Purbeck Hills I usually cycle in the summer and tried to think what could replace the agreeable Serow. As I did so the aroma of mud evaporating off the hot pipe took me right back to my earliest days dicking about on Surrey wastelands with ratty trail bikes (left).
What bike was as light, low saddled, semi-tubeless, economical, started on the button and came with racks and a screen? My CRF300L a couple of bikes back probably fitted the bill, but look at the huge amount of spending and work it required to reach that stage. I guess that’s why these old Serows hold their value.

Serow Touring XT250 1000 mile review

Serow index page

tik

• Economy: often over 100mpg so 300km range from the 9.3-litre tank
• 19hp was never really an issue, even at 11,000′ (when it became 12hp)
• Looks good
• As light as you’ll get for a regular trail bike
• Windscreen frame enabled near eye-level Garmin mounting which made a difference
• Came well equipped with racking and TL rear wheel
• Seat is low
• Starts and fuels with no fuss whatsoever
• No vibration through bars or pegs
Mosko bags did the job unobtrusively

cros

• Something was wrong with the front end
• I’m too big for this bike and couldn’t stand comfortably (common issue)
• Seat (or pants) need added padding
• Some days the TL rear tyre lost air, some it didn’t
• Ultra basic and barely legible LCD display
• Bigger footpegs needed a longer shifter with big boots/feet
• Front TL Kenda Big Block too stiff for this light bike

Review
On reflection, I was a bit slack preparing my Serow. It ticked so many boxes and was a ‘XT’ after all, I assumed it would do the job, like most XTs do. But after 10 days on the High Atlas Traverse (H.A.T) I can see how it could be improved for off roading.
Ascending the first dirt track – one I’ve done many times on many bikes – I could feel something was wrong. The front end flapped around rather than tracked straight like the Him 450 I last rode. It took a while to work out it was probably a combination of too stiff Kenda TL tyre at too high psi, plus probably what’s left of decade-old fork oil.

They say 250 Serow forks in particular are not so hot, but I was fooled by them being firm (they never bottomed out). They also say a $400 Cogent spring, oil and valve kit fixes that and – as a Serow owner I know will affirm – add their $800 shock and you’re sorted.

I now see RaceTech (also in the US) sell just the cartridge emulating valves (left) for around $230 + all the usuals, while in the UK Brooks sell similar Thai YSS valves for £84. I’ve read of these emulators without actually understanding exactly how they work but after watching this RT installation vid, I get it. Seeing as the forks are apart for a new seal and gaiter, I gave the YSS valves a shot.
Back in Morocco, even once the front tyre was dropped to 19psi, a lot of energy was spent keeping this thing on line on the steep, loose climbs of the H.A.T. Luckily, minimal weight and the easy-going motor producing its own ‘traction control’ made this possible. And elsewhere the Serow was fine.
I have to say the rationalising above still sounds a bit thin. I’m sure I’ve ridden ill-damped and poorly tyred bikes before, but something – maybe rearward weight distribution or my weight overall? – was off, though I was nowhere near the 160kg max payload stated in the manual. I see one bloke fitted an ebay steering damper to his Serow. They do say pricey off-road dampers like the Scott are enhancements rather than there to disguise unstable steering. I dismissed the notion that the weight of the hefty front rack and screen were an issue (that wrapped cloth bundle below is only a 500g bike cover, fyi). Really, it’s got to be a grand of Cogent springing that transforms the Serow – just like a grand’s worth on the CRF 300L did the same.

Sorted, carb’d TTR350 was dynamically loads better but ‘only’ did 75mpg, and you can see how much taller it is

Still, it’s amazing how adequate 19hp turned out to be – especially when vanned all the way down to KM Zero! Even up in the H.A.T Death Zone where only hardy microbes survive, the XT was never left wanting, even if it couldn’t pull beyond first at 10,000′. All motors lose power at altitude, but I like to think it’s the reliably even fuel injection which makes the scant power effective.
This lowly output must have contributed to economy of up to 108mpg or over 38kpl. An all-time record for me. The worst was about 88/31 and the average was 98/34.7, though exact figures probably got muddied by village fuel top-ups.

A low-slung chariot. Dropping outriggers and getting on – no problemo

The soft, low-down power meant the gearing didn’t feel under any strain, though 1st to 2nd had a bit of a gap and a 6th would have been nice. The narrow rear Anakee Wild was well matched for the pace and load, and probably helped keep the mpg in three figures.

Near identical and new non-Euro XT250s are easily rented in Morocco, but have tubes all round.

Having ridden ABS for years, I think my once finely honed braking finesse has suffered. Part of the problem was I was so squashed up that, unless sitting right back and upsetting the ride balance even more, my feet point down so that accurately modulating the rear brake was more than my Sidi clad ankles could do. Well, that’s my excuse. Were the seat a lot taller the knee angle would open up, the bum would go back and the feet would level off. And though I rarely stand, when you need to you must, but even with the risers fitted the stoop was not sustainable. Higher bars would need longer cables – a faff. And along with the stoop, the suspension probably didn’t inspire confidence to stand up and attack (that and a very sore leg from a needless lowside).

Another ergo problem I’ve never had before was caused by fitting bigger pegs for better standing support on the boor soles. It reduces the peg to shifter space (below) which, with brick-like Sidi Adventures, makes up-shifting awkward. But it seems I’m not the first to notice this, and adjustable shifters are available (below right). My oh my it’s amazing what you learn after a few full days on the trail!

As noted on previous AMH project bikes, stock suspension is commonly only adequate and technically dead simple to improve, compared to a motor. But I think I prefer the feel of a low-comp but injected air-cooled engine over a CRF, just like I preferred the CRF over the highly strung WR250R. The Serow has a mellow donkey feel which suits my slow/remote exploring prefs these days.

Serow 19hp and 140kg; TTR350 29hp and the same; KTM 390 170kg and 44hp.

Shaky front end apart, the Serow fulfilled its intended purpose: an easy bike to manage the unknown trails of the H.A.T. It started on the button, fuelled cleanly and never missed a beat. In places on the H.A.T, last year’s 450MT would have too much to handle. But while it could be easily improved, the Serow’s still a bit small for me.

Quo Vadis
Quo what? A KTM 490 X or R perhaps? or I wonder if I should take another spin on a Himalayan 450, a bike I expected to like but didn’t. It’s certainly my size and has great range, but manages to clock in with nearly 50% more weight. Not much you can do about that and heavy bikes do take it out of you over a day on the piste (improved suspension might ease the beating). I may try and rent one again.

A more stupid idea is adapting Honda’s air-cooled and injected GB350S (above left) into a travel bike. Everyone seems to love this 21-hp, Indian-built Honda ‘Bullet’. But I can guaran-damn-tee, I won’t be able to stand up on that without apehangers. And while supposedly as economical as the Serow, it weighs 178kg. I’ve never actually seen one; maybe it’s also too small for me.
That motor’s been around for years but when hiding behind retro styling you can get away with a low output. So not much chance of them spinning off a soft Adv, like Triumph have done with the more highly strung Scrambler 400XC (above right). The XC is also tubeless but is only 10kg lighter than a Him 450, won’t have anywhere near the economy or range and costs nearly double the GB. Both are tubeless. How lucky we are to have all these choices.

A high elevation, low-speed blur…